Defined-risk credit spreads¶
By now you have seen options mechanics, risk categories, and a side-by-side dollar comparison. This page explains why Spruce’s operating path prioritizes credit spreads — not why they are the only strategy that exists.
Not financial advice
Priority for a personal operating system is not a recommendation that everyone should sell premium.
Where credit spreads sit on the map¶
From Ways to manage risk:
- They are a spread (one option hedges another).
- Risk is defined (max loss ≈ width − credit).
- They usually offer limited reward and often max loss > max profit — a probability-oriented shape, not a lottery ticket.
Other valid tools on the same map: sizing alone, covered calls, cash-secured puts, debit spreads, protective puts, portfolio heat caps.
Why an operating system likes them¶
For batch review and later automation, a structure helps when:
- Max loss is knowable at entry.
- Naked unlimited upside risk is avoided.
- Heat across the book can be summed.
Put credit spreads (PCS) and call credit spreads (CCS) meet those constraints. That is an engineering preference for Spruce ops — after education, not instead of education.
Two workhorse structures¶
| View | Structure | Story |
|---|---|---|
| Stock should stay above the short put | PCS / bull put | Collect credit; crash risk capped by long put |
| Stock should stay below the short call | CCS / bear call | Collect credit; melt-up risk capped by long call |
Payoff math: Credit-spread payoffs.
Fair comparison with other approaches: Compare strategies.
Process sketch¶
- Thesis
- Expiration
- Strikes → max loss → risk policy
- Enter or skip
- Journal
- Manage with rules written calmly
Canadian note¶
Multi-leg spreads often need higher options approval and a margin account. See TFSA constraints.
Playbooks¶
Sources¶
Not financial advice. Verify broker rules yourself.